ad

Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Facebook bans data firm which worked with Trump campaign to harvest 270,000 users information without their knowledge




Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix is pictured. The company was banned from Facebook on Friday over its handling of user data 


Facebook has suspended Cambridge Analytica, the shadowy firm which worked with the Trump campaign and has been linked to Brexit, claiming it violated its policies by using the information of 270,000 users to inform their tactics.

In 2015, the social network discovered that Cambridge professor Dr. Aleksandr Kogan had given the information to the company after obtaining it legitimately through an app of his own.

The app was called This Is Your Digital Life and was downloaded by Facebook users once they had already logged in.

They willingly submitted their information to This Is Your Digital Life but were unaware what Kogan would do with it next, the site claims.

When Facebook learned that he had shared it with the Cambridge Analytica, they asked both to destroy it.

All assured that they had erased it and they continued using the site.

However several days ago, Facebook claims it received reports that not all of the information was erased.

'We are moving aggressively to determine the accuracy of these claims. If true, this is another unacceptable violation of trust and the commitments they made.

'We are suspending SCL/Cambridge Analytica, Wylie and Kogan from Facebook, pending further information,' Facebook VP and Deputy General Counsel, Paul Grewal, said in a statement.

Cambridge Analytica denies the allegation and insisted on Friday that none of the information it received from Kogan was used in the Trump campaign.


How to Know Whether someone has been 'stalking' you on Facebook




Facebook is a nifty platform for many functions, but two of its most popular remain making everyone jealous and creeping other people's profiles.
Come on and admit it - you're almost certainly guilty of doing the latter.
After all, looking at someone else's profile is now so easy to do, the act of grubbing through photos of their 2006 holiday may not even seem that big a deal.
Best of all, you can do it safe in the knowledge that unless you accidentally - shudder - 'like something', they'll never be any the wiser.


Or at least, that used to be the case.

It's not to say suddenly Facebook is going to adopt the same functionality as LinkedIn and reveal to its users who's been perusing their profile.




Facebook have always said they have no plans to reveal this data and, by and large, this remains the case.
It would dissuade many of its 1.86 billion users from utilising the site as fully as Facebook would like.
However, the site has introduced a new feature which means you may need to exercise a little more caution.
Facebook recently rolled out its 'Stories' feature to all of its mobile users.
Similar to the same feature on Instagram, Facebook Stories are short user-generated photo and video collections which can be viewed twice and then disappear after 24 hours
As with Instagram stories though, you can see how many people viewed your story AND who has specifically looked at each piece of content within your story.
So while you can resume your creeping of profiles in sweet anonymity, it's no longer 100 per cent across all of the site's features.

















Facebook Will Now Penalize Posts That Beg for Likes and Comments


Companies that beg their followers for some help in boosting their presence on Facebook will need to take a new tack.

Facebook said in a statement on Monday that it will begin clamping down on “engagement bait” across its social network starting this week. When pages ask for their fans to like, share, comment, or perform other actions on their content to boost the reach and get others who are not following them to see their content, Facebook will penalize them, the company said. It’ll do that by “demoting” posts from people that do a page’s bidding, as well as the pages themselves.

“To help us foster more authentic engagement, teams at Facebook have reviewed and categorized hundreds of thousands of posts to inform a machine learning model that can detect different types of engagement bait,” Facebook operations integrity specialist Henry Silverman and Facebook engineer Lin Huang said in a statement. “Posts that use this tactic will be shown less in News Feed.”

Getting more user engagement generally helps Facebook pages, which can be owned by companies, individuals, or other establishments, to boost their notoriety on the social network. That, in turn, could increase the number of people who follow those pages and ultimately help them improve their marketing capacity. But by asking for engagement, pages are effectively creating undesirable content that clogs up News Feeds and makes Facebook less user-friendly. Now Facebook is trying to do something about it.

The move is similar to algorithm changes Google makes to its search results to remove websites and webpages that aim only at getting users to click and don’t actually provide useful content.

Looking ahead, Facebook said that it will use “stricter demotions” on pages that ignore its reprisals and continue to post engagement bait. But the company was also quick to note that fundraising efforts, people asking for travel tips, or circulating a missing child report that seek others’ engagement will not be demoted.
















DOJ No Longer In Need Of Names of People Who 'Liked' Anti-Trump Facebook Page

DOJ No Longer In  Need Of  Names of People Who 'Liked' Anti-Trump Facebook Page

In a court hearing today, the Department of Justice dropped its request for the names of an estimated 6,000 people who “liked” a Facebook page about an Inauguration Day protest, the American Civil Liberties Union said. The ACLU challenged several warrants related to protests against President Trump’s inauguration on Friday, one of which included the search, claiming they were over-broad.

Specifically, the warrants target the Facebook profiles of two activists and an anti-Trump Facebook page, and the data turned over could have included the names of an estimated 6,000 people who simply “liked” the page. However, DOJ lawyers said during the hearing that they would no longer seek the list of names, the ACLU said. A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

TRENDING TECH CONTENTS






“The best aspect of the hearing was the judge clearly seemed to understand that the government asked for more than it needed,” Scott Michelman, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s DC branch, told Gizmodo after the hearing. “Ultimately, I think the question will be what kind of limits the judge orders.”

The case is the second known attempt by the DOJ to collect large swaths of data about people who participated in the January 20th protests. The DOJ also demanded that web hosting company DreamHost hand over the IP addresses of 1.3 million visitors to an anti-Trump website, disruptj20.org, but eventually dropped its request for the IP logs and had the scope of its warrant further narrowed by a judge.

YOU SHOULD READ THIS!




In this case, the Justice Department had asked Facebook to turn over all the information generated from two activists’ personal accounts between November 1st, 2016 and February 9th, 2017. The third warrant targeted the “Disrupt J20" Facebook page itself, which was liked by thousands people during the same period. In addition to excluding the list of people who had liked the page, DOJ lawyers indicated that they would no longer seek photographs from the activists’ accounts that were posted prior to January 20.

“Every demonstration that these folks attended or advertised or took pictures of, the other people who were there, whether they were expressing their political views—all of that will be available to the government. Same with private messages. In one case, a person’s medical information; in another case, a discussion of one person’s experience of domestic violence,” Michelman said. “We have moved to quash the warrants as over-broad and an invasion of privacy.”

The warrants were initially accompanied by a gag order, which the DOJ dropped in September after Facebook moved to challenge it. Facebook then notified the three activists that they were being targeted.

“Last month, we successfully fought to be able to notify the three people whose broad account information was requested by the government. Now that they have exercised their rights to contest the government’s warrants, we believe their arguments deserve a fair and full hearing,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

“My biggest concern here is the warrants, if carried out, will give information about anti-administration protesters to the very administration they are protesting. And that is very chilling of speech,” Michelman said.














Ashley Judd Uses Facebook Live Blasts ‘Everyday Sexism’ at Airport Security

Ashley Judd is speaking out against “everyday sexism.” During a recent visit to the airport, the actress, 49, claimed she encountered an airport employee that interacted with her in ways that she considers inappropriate.

She took to Facebook Live to send her followers a detailed explanation of the encounter and said this is the kind of thing people rarely speak up about because it seems insignificant.




“This is the kind of thing to me that happens which I categorize as everyday sexism,” she said. “And it is so easy to let it go and not to speak up, particularly when it is so easy for someone to push back and say ‘Oh, I was just being polite.’”




“So I was coming through security and a guy said ‘Hey sweetheart,’ and I said, ‘I’m not your sweetheart, I am your client.’ So I was already setting a boundary. When I was setting my things out, he said, ‘Hey nice dress!’” she explained. “I didn’t hear him say anything about the attire of any of the other folks in the entire line and I am in one of the most traveled airports in the world. I’m surrounded by lots and lots of other people dressed in lots of different kinds of dress.”
Judd then revealed the airport employee touched her, although she did not reveal how or where.
“I was speaking with one of his colleagues, she was saying, ‘Do you have high heeled shoes,’ and then guess what happened next? He touched me. I didn’t see him touch anybody else. And I turned around and I said, ‘That was unnecessary.’”
“By that time, you know, my skin was burning, my feet are burning. It’s so hard to continue to set these boundaries when someone continues to push. And then for good measure, he just said one more time, ‘have a good day sweetheart,’” she added.
The Divergent actress said that since she was early for her flight, she decided to put in a complaint with the manager.
“My intention is to put principles above personalities. I’m not here to be controversial. I am not here to be combative. But I asked for a manager, and I introduced myself and I shook his hand and I explained my situation and I also explained that there were also a lot of other people who saw it,” she said in the Facebook Live.




In a second video, Judd claimed that the manager apologized and said the employees are trained to address everyone as “sir” and “madam” and told not to touch anyone. Following their talk, the manager allegedly said he would be having a “second and longer conversation” when things were quieter at the airport.
Judd said her only intention for sharing the videos was to not only discuss a problem but to also highlight a solution.













I Can't Stop Responding After I Began a Private Facebook Friendship with My Ex's Wife


Of all possible illicit online liaisons, how did I wind up with my first lover's wife?

I fell for David when I was 14. But after six years together, I had a birth control mishap, an abortion, a meltdown and a humiliating split I couldn't erase—since he refused to speak to me. While I was friendly with other exes, this initial heartbreak remained foggy and unfinished.

By 35, I was married to a taller, sweeter man, sure I'd completely recovered from my first disastrous breakup. Yet during years of difficult fertility treatments, I was haunted by the pregnancy I'd ended in college. Was being barren punishment for not becoming a young mother? I feared I'd ruined my last chance. Should I have kept the baby? I craved an answer to that lingering question.





The Internet led me back to David, 500 miles away. I emailed him, asking to discuss our painful falling out two decades earlier.

"I'd rather take out my own appendix with a bottle of Jack and a dull spoon," he answered.

Still sardonic, the quality that originally attracted me. "Why?" I pushed.

"Let's leave the bad memories intact. Am I scared to see you again? Fucking right I am," he wrote. "Think you're still nuts? Is a trout's ass watertight? Can we finish with the joint therapy session now?"

This sarcastic exchange completed the chapters of my memoir that were focused on him. Upon publication, I sent him an O Magazine review of my book that included his quote, adding "It was just optioned by a film producer." I hoped he'd talk now that my romantic trajectory—and his fateful rejection—was deemed cinema-worthy.

"Hey, that's great," he replied this time.

I was relieved. Mature adults, we were over the past. No harm done. Trauma averted.

Until the next email: From his wife.

"Congrats on all ur success," she wrote.

He must have forwarded my message to her. I worried they'd shared a computer and joked about the original Crazy Ex-Girlfriend who wouldn't leave. I awaited a "get away from my husband" admonishment.

Instead she wrote, "I'd like Eva Mendes to play my part in the movie."

I wondered what she really wanted from me. To see what I looked like or if we were similar? To gloat? I decided his wife—let's call her "Eva"—was a test I had to pass to get a last heart-to-heart with her spouse. Assuming he was reading along, I typed how pretty she'd looked in a sparkly black dress at a party. I'd spied the picture web-stalking a classmate's Instagram, curious if David still had hair.

When Eva requested a Facebook friendship, I was flattered. Why not add her? Here's why not:

"No offense, but maybe think about losing the bangs?" she wrote. "Ur gorgeous, but darlin' it's aging u." She added, "p.s. Ur facebook entries suck ass. U write beautifully, but social media, not so much. I'm available for 50 bucks an hour :)"

This semi-stranger using tween slang wanted me to pay her to edit my web profile? Rather than finding my path to emotional resolution, I'd stepped on a landmine. Guess I wasn't the only one harboring hidden animosity.


Annoyed by her insults, I investigated her Facebook wall. No job mention, lots of selfies, Woody Allen quotes, an article "Do you Suffer from Decision Fatigue?" In khaki shorts, T-shirt, and sneakers, she looked like a cute camp counselor. There were few pictures of David. I was disappointed that their teenage son resembled her, not her husband, curious to revisit the curly red-haired science-brain I'd met in ninth grade.

Looking through her albums, I relived my six years with David. He was the first to take me to bed, to get me high at a Dylan concert, to give me jewelry (a gold heart necklace), to say "I love you." (Actually I blurted it out and he asked, "Think I'd put up with your insanity if I didn't love you too?") Despite our intense passion, we were socially acceptable, cruising to our little brothers' Bar Mitzvahs in his silver Camaro, blessed by our parents. Hooking up in Israel during my summer study abroad, it felt like we were both hot and holy, tricking the world.

Then, in college, despite using condoms, I found myself three weeks late. He proposed. But I was petrified, not ready for parenthood. After terminating the pregnancy, I had a drug and alcohol-fueled breakdown at 20, smoking, drinking, doing magic mushrooms and coke. Afraid of sex, David, and my body, I told him, "I need some time alone." When I resurfaced to apologize three months later, he wouldn't return my calls. He kept sending me agonized Bob Dylan lyrics in the mail. I assumed that meant he still cared.


So at two a.m. one autumn Friday, I impulsively drove my orange Cutlass four hours to his university in the middle of the night to ask why he was sending me cryptic typed-out words to Blood on the Tracks. He never really answered, though he did admit that he'd fallen for a petite girl who was under his covers in the other room. With Eva asleep in his bed, I cried in his arms on his living room couch. Then I drove home, sobbing to the Dylan bootleg he'd made me. It became the soundtrack of my dark era.

After graduation, I heard he landed a great job, married Eva and welcomed a son. Broke and adrift, I envied their prosperity and perfect family. When a friend said Eva's second child died in infancy, I was stunned, mournful for them. It threw me back to my own lost baby.

It turned out while I'd been burning to know their story, my memoir had ignited Eva's curiosity about me.

"Why did you change everyone's name in your book?" she now emailed.

"The Random House lawyer suggested pseudonyms," I explained.

"Why did you turn my dead daughter into a dead son?" she asked.

This stopped me. I felt guilty for appropriating her trauma. "I'm so sorry. It was a mistake," was how I finished this eerie cyber-chat with my one-time rival.

Yet Eva wasn't through with me. She disclosed that during my calamitous road trip, while she was in his bed, she'd been in lust with her Shakespeare professor. So while David was breaking my heart, he didn't know she'd been breaking his. Was she being competitive by confessing this? I'd just published a book about my old lovers, after all. Rather than regaining David's attention, I was stuck e-waltzing with his angry spouse. She'd been a mythical figure—the petite size-two brunette he'd chosen over me. (I was size eight on a good day. Was that why?)



"You look thin and lovely on TV," she wrote next, admitting that he hadn't encouraged her writing; he insisted their problems not be aired in public. I liked the idea that she might envy me.


"He loved being quoted in your book and O Magazine," she added.

It was electrifying to have a spy in his house, the least likely turncoat I could have imagined.

"He Googled?" I asked anxiously.

"He ran out to get a copy," she clarified. "Might be the first time he was in a bookstore."

More than any book press or old friends resurfacing for my launch, Eva's words compelled me. I couldn't stop reading and answering, like I was high on cocaine. In abbreviated missives, she confessed her own union was passionless, detailing their sexual problems. I'd unwittingly stumbled on the juiciest of insider scoops: The stud who'd left me for a hotter woman had been karmically avenged by discord in his marital bed.

A day later, Eva apologized for being "bitchy" and "passive-aggressive," saying "Have NO idea why I am writing such personal things to u. Will blame it on alcohol, heat wave, lack of impulse control." So she had an addictive personality—something else we shared. Clean and sober for years, I was getting swept up in a new compulsion: emailing my first boyfriend's mate.

It turned out she was Jewish, cynical, well-read. An English major. My age. Were we doppelgängers who switched lives? She'd aimed to publish too, but didn't know her subject.

"Try chronicling this electronic tête-à-tête with your husband's high school girlfriend," I offered.

"Then he'd know we're in touch," she said.

The revelation that he didn't know came as a surprise, and I was confused over who I should feel loyal to. If I ever told him, it might damage their marriage. If I didn't, I'd feel like I was her co-conspirator, trashing him—betraying my ex with the woman he'd once betrayed me for. In between work and the evening classes I taught, I kept checking my in-box to see what else Eva revealed.

This time she was the one alienated, frustrated, lonely in an empty relationship. Content in work and love at last, I expected vindication to wash over me. Yet knowing my first lover's wife was hurting made me sad and bizarrely worried. Underneath her snide tone, she seemed confused—like I used to be—pent-up, career-less, repressed in the conservative milieu I'd escaped.

"My shrink advised me to 'Lead the least secretive life,'" I wrote to her.

"Why am I confiding in you?" she questioned (me or herself?)

"Does a memoirist delving into unresolved pain hold up a mirror?" I asked.

"Am very entertained by this repartee :) PLEASE give me a subject. Will be one of ur protégées."

The wife of my worst heartbreak wanted me as her mentor. I used to envy her marriage, now she coveted my career. I felt emboldened. "Get an MFA. Write a book about the daughter you lost." I tried to assist her, unlock her, give her permission. "Two of my students published momoirs. They're hot." I listed bestsellers on motherhood, then worried I sounded insensitive. She didn't seem to mind.

"Ur a real firecracker," she answered. "Thanks."



But I wondered if I was I helping her, or updating my early amorous loss, so that this round, instead of playing the discarded girl, I'd be the heroine who won. After more intense cyber-volleys, my brain, husband, and therapist insisted: disconnect. To avoid staying stuck in the past, I quietly un-friended her, leaving the woman I'd over-connected with online, but had never even met.

The intimate portrait Eva provided offered an illuminating coda, clearing up many misconceptions: Waiting a decade longer than her to wed didn't ruin me, it saved me. Those extra ten years single allowed me time to finish graduate school and develop two professions I adored, with the help of a smart therapist who said, "Love won't make you happy. Make yourself happy."

Just as I let go of the fantasy that I needed to talk to my first ex in order to fully heal, he returned.

While he was visiting New York, he emailed, casually asking if I wanted to get together, as if I hadn't been begging for this rendezvous half our lives. I quickly showered, shampooed, put on makeup, flattering jeans, heels, perfume. When he came over, I stared at him. He was still cute, less burly, with hair (though it was thinner). Luckily there was no heat. We talked nostalgically for an hour, sipping bottled water. In retrospect, we were ridiculously mismatched; all we had in common was our history. Not wanting to hurt their marriage, I kept what Eva confided to myself.

The next day, I wondered why he'd finally reappeared.

"I wonder if Eva pushed him to meet with you?" my husband said.

Was I no longer a threat?

A few years later, when I learned they'd divorced, I guessed another reason Eva may have sent him to me: she no longer cared. Catching up with my first boyfriend felt sweet and healing. But it was nowhere near as charged, confessional, and intensely compelling as my clandestine email madness with his wife. She gave me the closure he couldn't.

Susan Shapiro is the author of the WHAT'S NEVER SAID and FIVE MEN WHO BROKE MY HEART. You can follow her on Twitter at @Susanshapironet.









Facebook, Google and Twitter Drag To Court By Families of Orlando Nightclub Shooting Victims


Families of the victims of the Orlando gay nightclub shooting on Monday filed a federal civil suit against Twitter, Facebook and Google for allegedly providing “material support” to the Islamic State and helping to radicalize shooter Omar Mateen.
In a complaint filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, the families of Tevin Crosby, Javier Jorge-Reyes and Juan Ramon Guerrero argue that the three web platforms "provided the terrorist group ISIS with accounts they use to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits."






"Without Defendants Twitter, Facebook, and Google (YouTube), the explosive growth of ISIS over the last few years into the most feared terrorist group in the world would not have been possible," the lawsuit states. 
Mateen, a 29-year-old security guard who pledged allegiance to ISIS, opened fire inside Orlando’s Pulse nightclub back in June; killing 49 people and wounding 53 others before being killed by a SWAT team to end the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.
"Life has not been easy for me or my whole family," Juan Guerrero, the father of one of the victims, said. "It is something I remember and have to live with every day."
ISIS quickly claimed responsibility for the attack via its Amaq news agency, although further investigation found that Mateen was not a member of the terror group but had been inspired by them in part through what he saw on the Internet.
“Mateen was radicalized by ISIS using the defendants tools for that express purpose,” Keith Altman, the lawyer representing the three families, said.
ISIS maintains an active presence on both Facebook and Twitter and also relies heavily on the Google-owned YouTube to post propaganda messages and videos of executions.
At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.
The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.
“Section 230 is a free pass to online service providers as long as they act only as a pass-through,” Mark Bartholomew, a professor at the University Of Buffalo School Of Law, said. “If you set up a place for people to talk, but don't communicate on it yourself, then you are basically immune from prosecution.”
Section 230 of the CDA has protected social media sites in the past, but some lawyers and academics have begun to argue sites like Facebook may be violating the provision with their heavily-guarded algorithms. Despite these algorithms having come under fire before – from how Facebook curated its Trending Topics to accusations that YouTube was censoring people – this lawsuit alleges something much more nefarious behind one of the tech world’s most secretive processes.
“The defendants create unique content by matching ISIS postings with advertisements based upon information known about the viewer,” Altman said.  “Furthermore, the defendants finance ISIS’s activities by sharing advertising revenue.”
Representatives from Facebook, Twitter and Google did not immediately reply to IPRESSTV’s request for comment.
While these social platforms have cracked down and deactivated accounts affiliated with terrorist groups in the past, Altman argued that another account will almost immediately pop up and that companies think they’re not responsible because they are not ones producing the content.
"I wish we could get some regulations put in place," Guerrero said. "They have to do something to prevent these people from doing things like this."
Experts on Internet law say that while in the past courts have been reluctant to hold these platforms responsible for content posted on their sites, if the suit filed by the Pulse victims’ families is successful, it could drastically reshape the world of social media.
“It would be a big change because it would be the first crack at making these companies liable for what shows up on our feeds,” Bartholomew said. “It’ll be interesting to see how big that crack is, because right now it’s a door without many cracks.” 









The Top 4 Technology Stocks to Buy Instead of Amazon or Facebook for 2017


Semiconductor and cybersecurity stocks are poised for growth—and relatively cheap.

The weeks before Thanksgiving brought a cornucopia of good news to tech investor Paul Wick. Five companies he owned in the Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund were acquired in rapid succession as an M&A wave swept the semiconductor industry—a slice of the technology sector to which Wick has dedicated nearly half of his $4.4 billion fund. Meanwhile, shares in the Silicon Valley–based portfolio manager’s biggest holding, LAM Research, hit an all-time high. “Yet there’s still considerable upside,” says Wick. “We’re more bullish about the semi­conductor industry than we are about software or the Internet sector.”






Technology, though one of the most profitable and fastest-growing S&P 500 sectors, also tends to be relatively expensive. And investors are jittery about how President Trump’s policies might ­affect some of the largest players: After Facebook  , Amazon  , Netflix , and Google   sold off in the wake of the election, DoubleLine CEO Jeffrey Gundlach advised investors “to stay away from these things in a big way.” But investors like Wick are finding exceptions to that ­sentiment—particularly in less glamorous but no less important corners of the industry.
Though it might seem imprudent to recommend a stock that’s already risen 35% this year, LAM Research   still trades at 13 times its 2017 estimated earnings. That means the stock trades at a 21% discount to the S&P 500 and is 18% cheaper than the technology sector. (For what it’s worth, LAM’s run pales beside that of the S&P 500’s best-performing stock in the first 11 months of 2016, the chipmaker Nvidia , whose stock has almost tripled.)
LAM doesn’t make the chips themselves, but rather equipment that companies like Samsung (one of its largest customers) use to put “flash” memory into semiconductors that are used in everything from iPhones to fitness trackers to Tesla  cars. Flash memory—so called because it processes data faster and with less heat than traditional hard disk drives—has become essential in enabling companies like Apple   to make its MacBooks more powerful and smaller at the same time, while allowing companies like Amazon and Spotify to retrieve music from their massive cloud libraries instantaneously.
Historically, LAM’s stock has traded at a discount because its earnings “tend to have a lot of wiggle,” fluctuating depending on electronics’ product cycles, says USAA’s head of equities John Toohey, who is also a fan of the stock. But for the past three years LAM has grown consistently, increasing sales at a rate of 18% annually and averaging earnings growth of 56%. Wick expects that robust growth to continue in 2017, as the accelerating pace of innovation keeps semiconductor foundries buzzing: “There is no such thing as a semiconductor cycle anymore,” he says. Plus, LAM pays a dividend yielding nearly 2%—and with almost two-thirds of its cash offshore, it could benefit from a potential tax-repatriation holiday in the U.S.
fun_earning_growth
As the number of devices connected to the Internet has expanded, so has concern over how to keep that data safe. Spending on cybersecurity equipment, including firewalls, was on pace to grow about 13% in 2016, to $10.6 billion, Gartner says, but that rate is expected to slow to 8% over the next few years. Still, Palo Alto Networks  , which makes state-of-the-art security systems known as next-generation firewalls, is growing its sales about four times as fast. “They’re really on the cutting edge to help people protect their infrastructure,” says Margaret Vitrano, portfolio manager of the $4 billion ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund. Although ups and downs in businesses’ cybersecurity spending can mean volatility for Palo Alto’s earnings and its stock, the company expects to grow revenue 31% next fiscal year, making its 2017 estimated P/E of 49 look fairly reasonable.
Elsewhere in cybersecurity, Wick likes Check Point Software Technologies , a cheaper option (a P/E of 17). Founded in Israel in the pre-dotcom-boom 1990s, Check Point has proved to be “much more shareholder-friendly” than some of its younger peers and social media companies, Wick says; the company has bought back stock from shareholders for 13 straight years through 2016.
Other investors are rethinking what it means to be a tech stock—finding opportunities in other industries where companies are using technology to make over their business models. Henry Ellenbogen, who manages the $16.3 billion T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, points to Vail Resorts   . Once just an elite place to ski in Colorado, Vail has adopted a subscription model for lift tickets the way Salesforce   has done for software and startup ClassPass has done for yoga and spinning classes: Think of it as a season’s pass with unlimited access to 13 different mountains in six states, Canada, and Australia. The company offers an app and harnesses its data to make chairlift lines more efficient—one reliable way to keep customers coming back. And Vail has been regularly acquiring new property and tucking it into its network, giving the company a scale that has helped Vail generate returns on capital unprecedented for its industry. The stock trades at a 2017 P/E ratio of 31, but Ellenbogen expects Vail to grow earnings organically 10% to 13% next year.
PICKS:
LAM Research   
Palo Alto Networks  
Check Point Software Technologies  
Vail Resorts  









How This Serial Con Man Deceived Silicon Valley and Swindled an NFL Star of Millions of Dollars


You've probably never heard of Eren Niazi, but you've certainly heard of his friends.
Anyone who has ever met Niazi has heard the stories about them. They include the two most important Steves in Silicon Valley: Apple co-founders Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Jobs, the inventor of the iPhone, took the young Niazi under his wing and made time for him just one week before his death from cancer in 2011. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is also a friend; he invited Niazi to accompany him to the Nasdaq on the day he rang the opening bell to mark Facebook's IPO and was devastated when Niazi told him he couldn't be there.





If you're a football fan, you also know of Niazi's business partner, Patrick Willis, the All-Pro linebacker who suddenly and shockingly left the San Francisco 49ers in 2015 to pursue a career in tech working alongside Niazi at his startup, Open Source Storage. Willis said working with Niazi at Open Source was a bigger honor than anything he had accomplished on the field.

San Francisco 49er Patrick Willis during 2013's Super Bowl XLVII.
CREDIT: Getty Images
You've probably never heard of Niazi, but you know the companies he's helped build. He helped code the websites of companies like Facebook and eBay, and his company, Open Source Storage, counted as clients a who's who of tech companies, ranging from Yahoo to Sony to AOL.
"I only like to take tough jobs," Niazi said in a promotional video from 2012. "The harder the job, the most demanding applications, the newest of innovation is what I've always been involved with, and that's what I love and have a passion for."
These were stories Niazi told, anyway. Those who spent enough time around him often found they didn't check out, but not until too late.
Niazi is a skinny man with black hair who typically wears thin, frameless glasses and flashy clothes. Niazi was known for his charismatic and engaging manner. He charmed the women around him and impressed the men he worked with. He could connect with anyone and gain their trust.
It didn't hurt that Niazi often mentioned his family's vast fortune. With his flashy clothes, his shining jewelry, the huge checks he wrote, his roaring BMWs and Ferraris, and his imposing NFL sidekick, Niazi had the accessories to match the image he sought to project.
He cut an unlikely figure, to be sure, but anything is possible in Silicon Valley. It's a land of meritocracy, those who work there always say, where the only thing that matters is your talent, not your pedigree. In this world, investors and executives don't care where you came from; they care only where you're going. They have money to spend, and they want to bet on the next big thing. The shorter the resume, the fresher the ideas might be.
Who would question Niazi's bona fides? Who even cared?
Most didn't. Not until September 29, when Niazi was arrested for shooting up a home he was living in, piercing multiple bullets through a football helmet worn in a Super Bowl and putting the life of a child in danger. That's when Willis, the owner of that helmet, began to question Niazi, the authenticity of his larger-than-life tales, and what the tech executive had done with his millions.
Earlier this month,  a lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court on Willis's behalf. The lawsuit accuses Niazi of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The suit seeks more than $2 million in disputed real estate and yet-to-be-determined monetary damages. A second, previously unreported lawsuit was filed by Willis farther south, in the Superior Court of San Benito County. The lawsuit raises the same allegations and seeks at least $1 million in disputed real estate damages.
To more than a few people in Niazi's past, what he did to Willis was not as surprising as much as it was the culmination of a career, a career that was not spent coding and cutting business deals, but rather, conning, scamming, bilking, over-charging, shortchanging, and lying to those around him. At least two former business associates have gone to the FBI with information about Niazi, although the agency can neither confirm nor deny the existence of an investigation.
These people knew Niazi was not what he made himself out to be, not remotely. But even they didn't know the full extent of what he was capable of.
Now that they know, they are afraid. A number of sources Inc. approached for this story agreed to speak only on condition of anonymity or declined to speak altogether, citing the fear that Niazi would seek to retaliate after his release from jail, which took place Thursday.
The idea that he would go after people he once called friends is all too plausible, says one such source. "He has no feeling for any of these people. There's no guilt or remorse there."

Heir to the turtleneck

The first time many in the tech industry heard the name Eren Niazi came in 2014 when The Street published a piece titled "Apple's Steve Jobs Would See Himself in Tech Pioneer Eren Niazi."
The article told of an ambitious entrepreneur who had founded Open Source Storage in 2001, when he was in his mid-20s. The young company's customers ranged from Friendster to Facebook and NASA, the article claimed. With Facebook alone, "Open Source Storage's efforts for the social media giant fetched $5.5 billion in revenue for open-source storage and commodity hardware," the article said.
It was a company on the fast track to success, but its run stalled as the Great Recession arrived, the article said. "Investors fought to control the enterprise, yet it went bankrupt. Niazi was out."
But like Jobs, his mentor, Niazi did not give up on his company. In 2013, he relaunched Open Source Storage, and quickly, the second iteration of the firm picked up where the original had left off. "Since its re-entry last year, the Silicon Valley-based company has sold 50 million shares to private investors (with no valuation disclosed), launched 12 new product lines, and exceeded its revenue targets in six months," the article said.
The story described a company with all the trappings of Silicon Valley success. It was exactly the kind of company that would spark the interest of an NFL superstar living in the tech capital of the world and nearing the end of his football career.

Inseparable partners

Willis and Niazi met each other sometime in late 2014, according to Willis's lawsuits and public accounts previously given by both individuals in the press. The two met by chance while both were living in Santana Row, a trendy shopping center and residential complex in San Jose.
Whenever he met anyone, Niazi was quick to reel off his outsize accomplishments as a tech entrepreneur and scene-maker. To a football player with no experience in business or tech, those stories were intriguing. "Patrick was easy," the source said. "He was looking for someone to mentor him in business as he prepared to walk away from football."
The two neighbors quickly became friends, and after just a few months of knowing each other, they also became business partners.

From left: Gracie Gato, Patrick Willis, another Open Source Storage employee, and Eren Niazi.
CREDIT: Courtesy Anonymous
Willis joined the company in early 2015, within weeks of his retirement from football. During his decorated career with the San Francisco 49ers, Willis had racked up 950 tackles, been named the Defensive Rookie of the Year, and been selected to the Pro Bowl in seven of his eight seasons in the NFL. His highest accomplishment was helping lead the 49ers to a Super Bowl appearance. Yet all that paled next to the pride he felt upon joining Open Source Storage, Willis said in an interview in September with CNBC.
Willis came in as an investor of Open Source Storage, a board member of the company, and its new executive vice president for partnerships. In his role, Willis was in charge of interviewing job candidates, Mashable reported. And as he had been by his teammates in football, Willis was well liked by his new colleagues.
"Patrick is the greatest guy I've met," said Gracie Gato, an employee of Open Source Storage from March until May. "He's the sweetest guy in the world."
Getting to know Willis, however, was not easy. Anytime Willis was in the office, Niazi kept the retired defender isolated from everyone else. When someone addressed Willis, Niazi and he would whisper in each other's ears before Niazi finally spoke for his business partner.
Willis rarely left Niazi's sight. Where one went so did the other. The two friends and business partners even had matching white gold and blue-jeweled rings on their fingers. Niazi showed off his new friend to everyone he knew as avidly as he had retailed his anecdotes about Zuckerberg and Jobs -- albeit from a distance.
"The way Eren treated Patrick was sort of like a pet. He would parade him around like 'Look at me, I'm with a celebrity,' " Gato said. "It was truly disgusting. It was disgusting. He exploited the hell out of Patrick."
Eventually, word of Willis's joining Open Source Storage reached the tech press. On May 18, Mashable published a glowing profile of Willis and the company. The story went viral and dozens more articles were written about the football legend's second act in Silicon Valley. Just one day later, word of the story reached another, more serious entity: the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The whistleblower

After being hired as an engineer in March and working at Open Source Storage for more than two months, Gato had become suspicious of her company. In all of that time, she had not written a single line of code. And Niazi treated everyone around her, with the exception of Willis, with an unpredictable temperament. He would hire and fire employees on a whim, several sources said, and he was just as likely to cut your salary as he was to give you a raise or promotion.
Gato herself had experienced that erratic behavior. Shortly after being hired, she was promoted (with no raise in salary) to director of customer support, but she never did anything. There were no customers to support because there was no product to sell. Never mind the 12 product lines Niazi claimed in his interview with TheStreet.
"He wasn't interested in making money or getting any type of sales whatsoever. It seemed like he was riding out whatever money he was on," Gato said. "It seemed like he just kept us on the payroll to look legit."
Suspicious, Gato set up a conference call, asking a friend to ask her colleagues basic sales questions about Open Source Storage's services. She suspected Open Source Storage wasn't legit, but she needed to find out, Gato said.
"When [my friend] asked them, 'What exactly do you guys do?' everybody was stuttering over themselves," Gato recalls. "That's when I found out this whole thing was a lie."
As far as Gato could gather, Open Source Storage's only source of income appeared to be Willis's NFL fortune. Gato quit on May 6 and never cashed her final check.
"I knew my paycheck came from Patrick. I refused to accept another dollar," Gato said. "I knew his fate, another broke NFL player -- I couldn't deal with that."
While the rest of the world was excited to see how Willis would do in the tech industry, Gato grew worried for the NFL star.
"Everything about Eren Niazi is fake," Gato wrote in a note sent to the FBI. "He is a Venture Capitalist [sic] worst nightmare. He defaults on debts, never pays them. He is now using a retired NFL player's money, and he has no product."
Along with the FBI, she reached out to news outlets. No one heeded Gato's warnings. She gave up. For months, she stopped trying to warn people until November 4, the day she saw the Inc. report about Willis's lawsuit, at which point she took to Twitter to contact this reporter.
Gato, however, was not the first person to contact the FBI about Niazi. In 2015, Glenn Carnahan had done the same.

'He could sell snow to an Eskimo'

Carnahan is the chief financial officer at Ridgeline Entertainment, a TV production company based in Auburn, California. Carnahan, along with his business partner Doug Stanley, had come up with an idea to create a TV channel based right in Facebook's News Feed.
As the two scouted for a development firm that could build out their vision, they were referred to Dodecahedron, a company owned by Niazi. As he did with everyone he met, Niazi quickly swept the pair off their feet. He told them about the supposedly pivotal role he'd played in Facebook's early days: Years earlier, before the company went public, Niazi had helped Mark Zuckerberg get the social network back online after his own engineers messed up its code, he said.
Niazi also promised to introduce Carnahan and Stanley to Wozniak, the guy who created the first Apple computers. With all of his connections, Niazi struck them as just the right guy to build out Smackdab, the name they gave to their idea.
"He could just sell snow to an Eskimo," said one source who worked for Niazi at one of his companies in the early 2010s. "He had a way with people of connecting with them and getting them to believe things."
Ridgeline Entertainment entered into an agreement with Dodecahedron. Niazi's company would be responsible for putting together Smackdab, take care of the hosting, file pertinent patents, and deliver subsequent updates for the site.
"There was flattery," Carnahan said. "We were a priority to him and that made us feel better and trust him."
Dodecahedron delivered the site. In a promotional video from 2012, Stanley can be seen claiming his company hired "the chief architect of Facebook, Eren Niazi," to oversee its creation.
"I've helped architect some of the world's largest websites, including Facebook, Shutterfly, eBay," Niazi says in the video.
But after the release of the website, Niazi's firm failed to provide the promised updates, Carnahan said. As time passed, the relationship became strained. Ridgeline wanted its updates, and as Carnahan looked more closely into the matter, he started seeing red flags he'd missed earlier.
One early sign was the hosting. Dodecahedron was charging Ridgeline $10,000 a month to host Smackdab, but after delving into the specifics, Carnahan found the hosting provider Niazi was using charged just $1,500 a month.
More alarming was Niazi's handling of the patent filing. Rather than list Carnahan and Stanley as the applicants, Niazi put his own name down, a copy of the document dated July 2012 shows. Carnahan was able to catch and correct the filing after a meeting with the patent lawyer that did not involve Niazi.
"He tried to make himself the owner of the intellectual property," Carnahan said.
Niazi had kept himself at the center of information flow to mislead them and charge inflated prices, and he had written the contract in a loose enough way to justify his actions, Carnahan said.
"He bled us in a very deliberate manner, and he managed it very well by shielding us from the people we should've been talking to," Carnahan said. "He preyed on our ignorance."
All in all, Dodecahedron charged Ridgeline almost $700,000 for its services. "We overpaid Eren by $500,000. That's a lot of content that we could've developed with that," said Carnahan, noting that although Ridgeline continues to operate, it is a shell of what it could have been. "We could've done a lot."
Carnahan wanted to sue, but Niazi had already wasted so much of their money that the partners chose not to squander their remaining resources on a distracting lawsuit. Instead, he put together a thick folder and went to the FBI's Sacramento office, Carnahan said.
The FBI said it can neither confirm nor deny the existence of an investigation. However, many of the companies and people Niazi claims to have worked with deny any involvement. Facebook and eBay both said they have never been clients of Niazi or Open Source Storage. As to whether Niazi and Zuckerberg ever had the friendship Niazi claimed, a Facebook spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. Wozniak, however, denies ever having met Niazi. "I do not know, nor know of, this person," he told Inc. via email.

Family feud

Another company Niazi claimed to have worked with is Yahoo. Niazi brought up Yahoo when he met with Swee and Ozkan Niazi, his aunt and uncle, one day in April 2007, according to court documents from 2009.
At the time, Niazi was still running the original Open Source Storage. Niazi told his aunt and uncle of the "rapid growth" the company was experiencing but he said that it was "short of cash" as it sought to fill a "significant order from Yahoo." Niazi needed their help in the form of a $200,000 loan.
Niazi promised Swee and Ozkan that he would quickly return them their money. The next day, Niazi stopped by his uncle's office to pick up the check. Weeks and then months passed without Ozkan and Swee getting any of their money back. Finally, on September 4, Niazi paid them a portion of their loan, a check for $30,000 listed as "loan-partial." Three weeks later, Ozkan contacted Niazi.

Eren Niazi.
CREDIT: Courtesy Anonymous
"Hello Eren, were you able to get that line of credit?" asked Ozkan in an email. "I am MAXed out on my credit cards. I need the funds back ASAP."
"Hello Uncle, I will call you tomorrow," responded Niazi later that day. "I am trying my best and do not have any credit lines available to me......"
For more than two years, Ozkan haggled with Niazi seeking the remainder of the loan. In the meantime, Open Source Storage filed for bankruptcy. The company listed about $1.5 million in assets and nearly $6 million in liabilities, according to bankruptcy filings from 2007.
Finally on December 7, 2009, Ozkan and Swee filed a formal lawsuit against Niazi. Emails included as evidence in that lawsuit showed that Open Source Storage never made a sale to Yahoo; the Sunnyvale company did take delivery of some OSS servers but returned them without making a purchase.
Like Willis would years later, the couple sued their nephew for breach of contract and securities fraud. They sought damages of $170,000 plus interest and legal fees. At the trial, Niazi alleged that the transaction was a business deal between Ozkan and OSS, not a personal loan.
Ozkan and Swee won their case and later won a challenge brought forth by Niazi. Collecting their money, though, was a different story.
Reached by phone in November, Swee said she was not able to speak as she and her husband were still going through legal proceedings. This reporter asked if Niazi had yet to pay back the $200,000 he had borrowed from his relatives. Quickly, before hanging up, Swee said no.

A trail of destruction

The lawsuits from Willis accuse Niazi of misleading the football player into investing his money into companies registered in Nevada. The plan was for Willis and Niazi to grow their fortunes as co-investors, combining their assets. The lawsuits allege that while Willis upheld his part of the agreement, Niazi did not.
Willis is now seeking full ownership of six properties that Niazi purchased throughout Santa Clara and San Benito via the Nevada companies. Some of the properties were purchased by companies that name both Willis and Niazi as partners. One of the properties -- a stately house in Hollister, worth more than $1 million, according to the county assessment -- was purchased through a Nevada business that lists Niazi as the sole member, one of the lawsuits alleges.
"Niazi made that property his home, representing that he owned it and purchased it with his own money," the San Benito lawsuit claims. "Of course, he never paid Plaintiff anything in rent for the months he lived there."
Aside from the $3 million in property disputes, Willis's lawyers said they do not yet have exact figures for the monetary damages they will be seeking. One of Willis's attorneys told Inc. they have hired forensic accountants to investigate but anticipate the damages sought at trial will be significant. One source who worked with Niazi in the past year said the amount may be between $13 and $14 million.
Earlier this week, Niazi retained a new attorney, who addressed the football player's allegations against her client on Tuesday. "I'm bothered by the idea that there are people who are saying and speaking ill of some of his business dealings," said Katy Young, a partner at Ad Astra Law Group.
Young met with Niazi for the first time on Tuesday and spoke with him for a number of hours. After the meeting, Young said that she reached out to the lawyers who are representing Willis.
"Eren is interested in coming to an amicable resolution as possible," Young said. "He genuinely cares for Patrick Willis and certainly never meant to harm him. It's a delicate case because there is a friendship that hangs in the balance. Unclear whether they'll ever be able to rectify that."
As to the claims made in Willis's lawsuit, Young said, "Mr. Willis's complaint is very general in its fraud allegation, and the rule regarding pleading fraud in a civil context is that fraud has to be pled with particularity. The plaintiff, Mr. Willis in this case, would have to articulate the who, what, when, why and how of the alleged defrauding that took place."

Shooting spree


Eren Niazi appears in court at San Benito County for his criminal case.
CREDIT: Courtesy Anonymous
The incident that resulted in Niazi's jailing took place at a house located 50 miles south of San Jose, in a tiny California town of 35,000 people called Hollister. It is a huge, eight-bedroom home with a brick driveway the length of a football field. The home sits on a vast, 16-acre lot. There is a large American flag that waves in front of the home's four-pillared entrance. The mansion is nicknamed the White House, and it is unlike any of the small homes that surround it. It's one of the properties under dispute in Willis's lawsuit, the one Niazi allegedly bought with Willis's money while listing himself as sole owner.
Residing in the house with Niazi was a woman who has subsequently obtained an order of protection against him from San Benito Superior Court. (Another woman has also obtained such an order.) The woman's young child was with her in the house that night as well, according to a source who has spoken with her subsequently.
That night, Niazi permitted a child "to suffer and to be inflicted with unjustifiable physical pain and mental suffering," according to the case brought against him on behalf of the state of California. He used a Smith and Wesson 10mm handgun, and he "willfully and unlawfully discharged a firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could result in injury and death to a person," the documents read.
"He just freaked out," said the source who spoke with the woman who was in the house with Niazi that night.
"He grabbed his gun and then started shooting holes in the wall like a commando up and down the hallways," adds the source, who visited the house following the shooting. The source noted the black scuffmarks and dark bullet holes on the walls that were left by Niazi and were still visible a few days after the shooting.
Niazi took several shots at the walls and out of the windows of the home. He then went into a room in the home where Willis kept several bits of memorabilia from his eight-year NFL career. Among the articles was a 49ers helmet that the source said he believes is the same one worn by Willis during his Super Bowl XLVII appearance against the Baltimore Ravens in 2013.
"He killed that helmet. There's several bullet holes in it," said the source. "It's not replaceable."

Escape plan

On Thursday, November 17, Niazi was released from jail after pleading no contest to gross and negligent use of a firearm and agreeing to post $50,000 in bail. The other charge against him, child endangerment with use of a firearm, was dismissed. Under the conditions of his release, Niazi must take medications for bipolar disorder and cannot possess a firearm.
Thomas Worthington of the Worthington Law Centre, the attorney representing Niazi in his criminal case, said his client had had a mental breakdown. Earlier that night, Niazi had been taken to the hospital on a so-called 5150, an involuntary psychiatric hold. The shooting spree occurred only after Niazi was released, Worthington said.
"I'm convinced from everything that I reviewed that he really had no intent to harm anyone whatsoever, on that particular day," said Worthington.
"What he thought he was doing was protecting his family, and in my opinion, it was a product of his impaired mental functioning at the time," Worthington said. Worthington said he has objected to findings that Niazi is incompetent to stand trial. Niazi has the right to a jury trial, and that is what they have demanded, Worthington said. Niazi's sentencing is set for December 15, and felony probation has been granted, the lawyer said.
"Going back further, these issues about investments and whether he intentionally cheated any investors -- from what I have learned about this man is that he is a good person. There is no record that he has ever been in trouble in his life in a criminal way," Worthington said.
"I believe that as we continue to explore this we will learn that his mental condition contributed to the decisions he made and the actions that he took probably in all those years," Worthington said. "I do not think that he intentionally bilked people of money."
Given Niazi's long history of manipulation and deceit, however, those around him are unwilling to write off all of his actions to factors beyond his control.
"He got found out, and he didn't have a way out," said a former colleague who has known Niazi for close to a decade. "The escape plan was to go nuts. But he's not nuts. He's a very smart man."









RECENT POSTS

ad